Karen Elizabeth Mcmanus v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 KAREN M.,1 Case No. 2:20-cv-06202-GJS
12 Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
13 v. ORDER
14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 18 Plaintiff Karen M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her applications for 20 Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The 21 parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate 22 Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 14 23 (“Pltf.’s Br.”) and Dkt. 15 (“Def.’s Br.”)]. The Court has taken the parties’ briefing 24 under submission without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the 25 Court finds that this matter should be remanded for further proceedings. 26 27 1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name 28 …