Unknown

Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20212:21-cv-03658California460 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-3658-JGB (KS) Date: May 14, 2021 Title Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown

Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge

Gay Roberson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On April 21, 2021, Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a one-page document titled “citizen complaint or judicial intervention” against the “San Diego Court Clerk” in regards to “fees for state habeas writ.” (Dkt. No. 1.) The Clerk initially docketed the document as a habeas petition, but the Court, upon further review, determined that Plaintiff was not challenging the fact or duration of his custody and, therefore, had filed a civil rights complaint— not a habeas petition. (Dkt. No. 4.)

However, the Complaint identifies no specific constitutional violations and provides no specific statement of facts. Accordingly, the Complaint is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.