Miguel Rodriguez v. Just Brands USA, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
10
11 MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of Case № 2:20-CV-04829-ODW (PLAx) himself and others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. STAY [65], AND GRANTING 14 MOTION TO DISMISS [63]
JUST BRANDS USA, INC., JUST
15 BRANDS, INC., and SSGI FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.,
16 Defendants. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Miguel Rodriguez filed this putative class action against Defendants 20 Just Brands USA, Inc., Just Brands, Inc., and SSGI Financial Services, Inc. (First Am. 21 Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 60.) Defendants now move to (1) stay the case pending 22 regulatory guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and 23 (2) alternatively, to dismiss the FAC. (Mot. Stay (“MTS”), ECF No. 65; Mot. Dismiss 24 (“MTD”), ECF No. 63; see also Opp’n MTS, ECF No. 68; Reply ISO MTS, ECF 25 No. 70; Opp’n MTD, ECF No. 67; Reply ISO MTD, ECF No. 69.) For the following 26 reasons, the Motion to Stay is DENIED, and the Motion to Dismiss is…