John Richard Pokras v. Superior Court of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20212:21-cv-03545California5,138 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JOHN RICHARD POKRAS, Case No. 2:21-cv-03545-JVS (GJS) 12 Petitioner

ORDER: SUMMARILY

13 v. DISMISSING PETITION; AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF

14 SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS APPEALABILITY

ANGELES,

15 Respondent. 16 17 18 On April 23, 2019, Petitioner filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition in this 19 District Court [Dkt. 1,“Petition”]. The Petition stems from Petitioner’s state 20 criminal sentence and, possibly, from the COVID pandemic, as discussed below 21 [Petition at 3.]1 22 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States 23 District Courts requires summary dismissal of Section 2254 petitions “[i]f it plainly 24 appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled 25 to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. The Court has 26 carefully considered the Petition and related documents filed by Petitioner, as well 27 as the record, and finds that summary dismissal of this action, without prejudice, is 28 required. 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.