Edmond Neal v. Ven Hoover, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20212:21-cv-01000California968 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EDMOND NEAL, ) Case No. CV 21-1000 FMO (PVCx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 VEN HOOVER, LLC, ) ) 14 Defendant. ) ) 15 16 On February 22, 2021, the court issued its Standing Order Re: ADA Accessibility Cases 17 (see Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of February 22, 2021), which ordered plaintiff Edmond Neal (“plaintiff”) 18 to file a proof of service demonstrating service of the Complaint on all parties “within 93 days of 19 the filing of the case absent a previously approved extension of time by the court.” (Id. at 2). The 20 court admonished plaintiff that “failure to file the proof of service within 93 days after the filing of 21 the case shall result in the dismissal of the action and/or the defendant that has not appeared in 22 the case and for which plaintiff has not filed a proof of service.” (Id.) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 23 Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.