Jose L. Castillo v. C. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20215:18-cv-02187California3,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JOSE L. CASTILLO, Case No. EDCV 18-2187-VAP (KK) Plaintiff, v. FINAL REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

C. JOHNSON, ET AL., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 This Final Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. I. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION Jose L. Castillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against defendant C. Johnson (“Defendant”) and four Doe defendants (collectively, “Doe defendants”) in their individual capacity. For nearly six months and after multiple attempts by Defendant to schedule Plaintiff’s deposition by prosecute this action. Defendant has now filed a Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.