Summitridge Venture Group v. Mitali Parmar

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20212:21-cv-03809California668 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-3809-MWF (AGRx) Date: May 27, 2021 Title: Summitridge Venture Group v. Mitali Parmar et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO ALAMEDA

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PURSUANT TO 28

U.S.C. § 1452(b)

Cross-Defendant Vikram Spinivasan removed this action from Alameda County Superior Court on May 4, 2021. (See Notice of Removal (“NoR”) (Docket No. 1)). The claims at issue in this action arise solely under state law. (See generally id.). Srinivasan contends that the Court has original jurisdiction over the action because it raises a federal question: whether the Alameda County Superior Court judge violated the automatic bankruptcy stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, which Srinivasan claims has been in force since Summitridge filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Central District of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.