Summitridge Venture Group v. Mitali Parmar
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 21-3809-MWF (AGRx) Date: May 27, 2021 Title: Summitridge Venture Group v. Mitali Parmar et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge
Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present
Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO ALAMEDA
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1452(b)
Cross-Defendant Vikram Spinivasan removed this action from Alameda County Superior Court on May 4, 2021. (See Notice of Removal (“NoR”) (Docket No. 1)). The claims at issue in this action arise solely under state law. (See generally id.). Srinivasan contends that the Court has original jurisdiction over the action because it raises a federal question: whether the Alameda County Superior Court judge violated the automatic bankruptcy stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, which Srinivasan claims has been in force since Summitridge filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Central District of California…