Warden

Jorge Martinez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20215:21-cv-00915California1,853 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 JORGE MARTINEZ, ) Case No. 5:21-cv-00915-VAP-JDE ) 12 Petitioner, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 13 v. ) ) THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE 14 UNKNOWN, ) ) DISMISSED ) 15 Respondent. ) ) 16 ) ) 17

18 On May 26, 2021, the Court received a document from Petitioner Jorge 19 Martinez (“Petitioner”) that appears to be an incomplete Petition for Writ of 20 Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 21 wherein Petitioner purports to be challenging sentences imposed on September 22 15, 2019 and November 18, 2019 in Case No. “10-0028M.” Dkt. 1 (“Petition” 23 or “Pet.”).1 24 A habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is subject to the same 25 screening requirements that apply to habeas petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. 26

27 1 Although Petitioner indicates he is not represented by counsel, the attorney signature line on the form habeas petition was signed by Randy Valdez. Pet. at 5. 28 1 § 2254. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.