Warden

Jorge Martinez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20215:21-cv-00915California1,853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION JORGE MARTINEZ, ) Case No. 5:21-cv-00915-VAP-JDE ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. ) ) THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE UNKNOWN, ) ) DISMISSED ) 15 Respondent. ) ) 16 ) )

On May 26, 2021, the Court received a document from Petitioner Jorge Martinez (“Petitioner”) that appears to be an incomplete Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, wherein Petitioner purports to be challenging sentences imposed on September 15, 2019 and November 18, 2019 in Case No. “10-0028M.” Dkt. 1 (“Petition” or “Pet.”).1 A habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is subject to the same screening requirements that apply to habeas petitions brought under 28 U.S.C.

1 Although Petitioner indicates he is not represented by counsel, the attorney signature line on the form habeas petition was signed by Randy Valdez. Pet. at 5. 28 § 2254. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.