Lidia Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10
11 LIDIA GONZALEZ; RICHARD Case № 2:18-cv-09117-ODW (ASx) ARCIGA; and YESENIA MARTINEZ, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; CITY OF
15 LONG BEACH; PATRICK FREY; DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 16 ADRIAN GARCIA; MARK BUGEL; MOTION FOR SUMMARY
CHRISTOPHER BRAMMER; MARY JUDGMENT [56]
17 MARSCHKE; ANTON FISCHER; ALFREDO CHAIREZ; and DOES 1 18 through 10, inclusive,
19 Defendants. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiffs Lidia Gonzalez, Richard Arciga, and Yesenia Martinez brought 22 several causes of action for civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state 23 law against Defendants the County of Los Angeles (“County”), the City of Long 24 Beach (“City”), Patrick Frey, Adrian Garcia, Mark Bigel (erroneously sued as Mark 25 Bugel), Christopher Brammer, Mary Marschke, Anton Fischer, and Alfredo Chairez. 26 Plaintiffs have already settled their claims against Frey. (Not. Cond. Settlement, ECF 27 No. 80.) And all claims against the County…