Warden

Gennaro Bruno v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20212:20-cv-06390California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENNARO BRUNO, Case No. CV 20-6390 JFW (PVC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

WARDEN, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and Petitioner’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 22 In the Objections, Petitioner requests that his habeas petition be re-filed as a civil rights complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). However, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, it is not appropriate to do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.