Evelyn Thomas v. Century Villa, Inc.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20212:21-cv-03013California4,708 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EVELYN THOMAS, Individually and Case No. 2:21-cv-03013-MCS-KS 11 as Successors-in-interest to The Estate of Ben Thomas; YOLANDA 12 THOMAS, Individually and as ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 Successors-in-interest to The Estate of MOTION TO REMAND [11] AND Ben Thomas, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 14

TO DISMISS [9]

15 Plaintiffs,

16 v. 17 CENTURY VILLA INC., doing 18 business as Century Skilled Nursing 19 Care, et al.

20 Defendants. 21 22 23 Before the Court are two motions. The first motion is a motion to remand filed 24 by Plaintiffs Evelyn Thomas and Yolanda Thomas (“Plaintiffs”). MTR, ECF No. 11. 25 The second motion is Defendant Century Villa, Inc.’s (“Century Villa”) motion to 26 dismiss. MTD, ECF No. 9. Plaintiffs included their opposition to Century Villa’s 27 motion to dismiss in their motion to remand. ECF No. 11. Century Villa filed an 28 opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Opp’n to MTR, ECF No. 13. Century Villa 1 also filed the same Requests for Judicial Notice with their motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.