Durian Germaine Gray v. Christian Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20215:20-cv-00490California243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURJAN GERMAINE GRAY, Case No. CV 20-490-JAK (PD)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v.

AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

Respondent. UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records 20 on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and Respondent’s Reply to the Objections. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 25 Further, for the reasons stated in the Report, the Court finds that Petitioner 26 has not made a substantial showing of the denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.