Durian Germaine Gray v. Christian Pfeiffer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURJAN GERMAINE GRAY, Case No. CV 20-490-JAK (PD)

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

13 v.

AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

14 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

15 Respondent. UNITED STATE 16 MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

17 APPEALABILITY

18

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records 20 on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 21 (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and Respondent’s Reply to the 22 Objections. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the 23 Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it 24 as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 25 Further, for the reasons stated in the Report, the Court finds that Petitioner 26 has not made a substantial showing of the denial of…