Rosely Zapon v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20212:20-cv-11415California4,368 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 | ROSELY ZAPON, Case No. 2:20-cv—-11415 ODW (RAOx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 VS. 13 || COSTCO WHOLESALE OFEULATED PROTECTIVE 4 Gelksine LON: and DOES | to 25, 15 Defendant. 16 17 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 19 || proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 29 || and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 91 || Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 92 || following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does 93 || not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that 94 || the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 95 || information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 26 || legal principles. 27 3g || | This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.