Stacy Marie Savala v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20212:20-cv-04737California2,568 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STACY MARIE S., ) No. CV 20-4737 AGR ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) 14 ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff1 filed this action on May 27, 2020. The parties have filed a Joint 18 Stipulation that addressed the disputed issues. The court has taken the matter under 19 submission without oral argument.2 20 Having reviewed the entire file, the court affirms the decision of the 21 Commissioner. 22 23 24 25 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and 26 Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to proceed before the 28 1 I. 2 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.