Arcona, Inc. v. Farmacy Beauty, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 11
22
33
44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 ARCONA, INC., Case No. 2:17-cv-7058-ODW (JPRx)
1122 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED
1133 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND COSTS [153]
1144 FARMACY BEAUTY, LLC, et al.,
1155 Defendants.
1166 1177 I. INTRODUCTION 1188 Plaintiff Arcona, Inc. sued Farmacy Beauty LLC and its officers (collectively, 1199 “Farmacy”) for various claims related to Farmacy’s use of Arcona’s trademark 2200 “EYE DEW.” The Court granted summary judgment in favor of Farmacy on 2211 Arcona’s counterfeiting claim because, apart from the use of the phrase “EYE DEW,” 2222 the two products look nothing alike. Pending before the Court is Farmacy’s renewed 2233 motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (Mot., ECF No. 153). For the reasons discussed 2244 below, the Court GRANTS Farmacy’s Motion.1 2255 2266 2277
2288 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. …