Ripdaman Narula v. Orange County Superior Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RIPDAMAN NARULA, Case No. 8:19-cv-00133-DSF-JC 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. CONCLUSIONS, AND 13 RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and 19 accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 20 reflected in the May 3, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”). 22 On May 17, 2021, Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation in a 23 document entitled “Plaintiff Requests Hon. DJ to Reject Hon. MJ’s 24 Recommendations Completely and Grant Plaintiff’s November 22 Summary 25 Judgment Motion” (“Objections”). (Dkt. No. 84). For the reasons discussed 26 herein, Plaintiff’s Objections are overruled. 27 In the Objections, Plaintiff complains the Magistrate Judge is “too prejudice 28 against him – very prejudice.” (Dkt. No. 84). To the…