Ripdaman Narula v. Orange County Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RIPDAMAN NARULA, Case No. 8:19-cv-00133-DSF-JC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the May 3, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”). On May 17, 2021, Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation in a document entitled “Plaintiff Requests Hon. DJ to Reject Hon. MJ’s Recommendations Completely and Grant Plaintiff’s November 22 Summary Judgment Motion” (“Objections”). (Dkt. No. 84). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiff’s Objections are overruled. In the Objections, Plaintiff complains the Magistrate Judge is “too prejudice against him – very prejudice.” (Dkt. No. 84). To the…