Landec Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20212:21-cv-04274California480 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-4274-DMG (RAOx) Date June 15, 2021

Title Landec Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, Page 1 of 2 Syndicate No. 2003 XLC and Syndicate No. 0033 HIS, Subscribing to Policy No. B0595XR5938019

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

On May 21, 2021, Plaintiff Landec Corporation filed a Complaint against Defendants Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”), Syndicate No. 2003 XLC and Syndicate No. 0033 HIS, Subscribing to Policy No. B0595XR5938019, asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. [Doc. # 1.]

Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.