Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London v. Zurich American Insurance Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 20-7966-DMG (RAOx) Date June 15, 2021
Title Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. Zurich American Page 1 of 2 Insurance Co., et al.
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
On August 31, 2020, Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”) filed a Complaint against Defendants Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) and Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. (“Bigge”) asserting claims for equitable subrogation, equitable indemnity, and equitable contribution against Zurich, and express indemnification against Bigge, arising out of costs of defense and settlement in the case Khanh Keomanee, et al. v. Suffolk Construction, et al., No. RG18910422 (Cal. Super. Ct. 2018) (the…