Latia Suttle v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20212:21-cv-01225California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

BACKGROUND

On February 10, 2021, Plaintiff Latia S. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint challenging the denial of her application for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and/or Title XVI Supplemental Security Income by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 2.

On March 16, 2021, the Court issued a Case Management Order (“CMO”) instructing Plaintiff to “file with this [C]ourt proof of service” of the summons and Complaint on Defendant Commissioner of Social Security “not later than ninety-seven (97) days after the filing of the [C]omplaint,” i.e. no later than May 18, 2021. Dkt. 7 at 1-2 (emphasis in original). The CMO warned Plaintiff that “failure to timely effectuate service may result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice by reasons of [P]laintiff’s failure to prosecute, unless [P]laintiff can show good cause for extending the time for service.” Id. at 2 (emphasis in original).

As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff still has not filed a proof of service, per the Court’s

CMO.

Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.