Eddie Turner v. Ralph M. Diaz
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EDDIE TURNER, ) NO. CV 20-0830-AB (KS)
11 Petitioner, ) 12 ) v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) 13 ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED 14 RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) 15 Respondent. ) 16 _________________________________ ) 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative Petition for Writ of 19 Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”), all the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation 20 of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo 21 review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has raised objections (“Objections”) 22 (Dkt. No. 54) as well as his renewed request for an evidentiary hearing (Dkt. No. 49). 23 24 Most significantly, Petitioner asserts that the Court “looked through” the California 25 Supreme Court’s decision to the wrong decision by the California Court of Appeal. (See 26 …