Demetrius T Freeman v. William Barr

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 DEMETRIUS TERRELL FREEMAN, CASE NO. ED CV 20-00827-DSF(AS) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 13 v. CONCLUSIONS AND 14 FELIPE MARTINEZ, Warden, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED 15 STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 21 First Amended Petition, the relevant records and the attached Final 22 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After 23 having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Final 24 Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed,1 the 25 Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the 26 1 The Court construes Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary 27 Hearing and Judicial Notice (Docket No. 38) as objections to the Final Report and Recommendation. 28 1 Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. However, the 2 Court addresses certain arguments raised in the objections below. 3…