Unknown

Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20212:21-cv-03658California569 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

JS-6

3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

ALONZO MCKINNEY, ) NO. 21-CV-03658-JGB (KS)

11 ) Plaintiff, 12 ) v. ) 13 ) ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 14 UNKNOWN, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) 16 _________________________________ ) 17 18 On April 21, 2021, Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a one- 19 page document titled “citizen complaint or judicial intervention” against the “San Diego Court 20 Clerk” in regards to “fees for state habeas writ.” (Dkt. No. 1.) The Clerk initially docketed 21 the document as a habeas petition, but the Court, upon further review, determined that Plaintiff 22 was not challenging the fact or duration of his custody and, therefore, had filed a civil rights 23 complaint—not a habeas petition. (Dkt. No. 4.) 24 25 However, the Complaint identifies no specific constitutional violations and provides no 26 specific statement of facts. The Complaint also appears to sue a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.