De'Asia Niblett v. Universal Protection Service, LP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DE’ASIA NIBLETT, Case No.: 2:21-cv-03151-SB-RAO [U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 Plaintiff, ROZELLA A. OLIVER]

13 vs.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; ORDER1

UNIVERSAL PROTECTION

15 SERVICE, LP; OFFICER J. RODRIGUEZ; DOES 1 through 10, 16 inclusive,

17 Defendants. 18 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 19 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 20 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 21 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 22 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 23 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 24 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 25 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 26 27 1 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 2 …