Aaron Willie Brigham v. Prison Law Offices San Quentin

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20215:20-cv-02525California619 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EASTERN DIVISION

AARON WILLIE BRIGHAM, No. EDCV 20-02525-DDP (DFM)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

PRISON LAW OFFICES SAN

QUENTIN et al.,

Defendants.

On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff constructively filed a pro se civil rights complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dkt. 1. On January 11, 2021, the Magistrate Judge dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. See Dkt. 4. That Order was returned as undeliverable. See Dkt. 5. Accordingly, on January 28, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) instructing Plaintiff to provide a current address within fourteen (14) days. See Dkt. 6. Plaintiff was expressly warned that failure to do so may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. See id. The OSC was also returned as undeliverable. See Dkt. 7. Local Rule 41-6 requires that a party proceeding pro se “must keep the Court . . . informed of the party’s current address as well as any telephone number and email address.” If a Court order or other mail served on a pro se plaintiff at his address of record is returned . . . as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.