Theodora Medley v. Kathleen Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20215:21-cv-00937California2,311 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:21-937-DOC (MAR) Date: June 23, 2021 Title: Present: The Honorable: MARGO A. ROCCONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ERICA VALENCIA N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED AS SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE, AND INSTEAD

BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT PURSUANT TO 28

U.S.C. § 1631 FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION

On May 9, 2021, Theodora Medley (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“section 2254”), challenging her 2000 murder conviction. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1.

The Petition is subject to dismissal under section 2254(b)(1) because it appears to be second or successive.2 See Medley v. Runnels, 506 F.3d 857 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). The Court will not make a final determination regarding whether the Petition should be dismissed, however, without giving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.