James Smith v. Ron Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20212:21-cv-04531California1,560 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

Background

On June 1, 2021, the Court received and filed Petitioner James Smith’s (“Petitioner”) pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges one ground for federal habeas relief, claiming as follows: “Petitioner is being denied his liberty interest right from being subjected [to] a term of imprisonment that is disproportionate to his individual culpability amounting to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment[s] secured to him under the United States Constitution.” (Id. at 5.)1

Petitioner was convicted of first-degree murder in 1989 and sentenced to a term of twenty- five years to life in prison. (Pet. 2.)2 In July 2017, after a holding a youth offender parole hearing, the State of California Board of Parole Hearings (“Parole Board”) denied Petitioner release on parole for a period of five years. (See id. at 32–145 (July 27, 2017 Parole Hr’g Tr.).) Petitioner then unsuccessfully challenged this parole denial in state habeas proceedings. On February 26, 2018, the

1 Pinpoint citations in this Order refer to the page numbers appearing in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.