Warden
Sharvon Edward Fredrick v. Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
Background On January 12, 2021, the Court received and filed Petitioner Sharvon Edward Fredrick’s (“Petitioner”) pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) While the Petition is difficult to comprehend, Petitioner appears to raise claims based on the COVID-19 pandemic, making references to COVID-19, vaccines, and face masks. (See id. at 2–6.)1 On January 29, 2021, the Court issued an Order identifying the following procedural defects with the Petition and ordering Petitioner to respond by March 2, 2021: (1) the Petition appears to challenge Petitioner’s conditions of confinement rather than raising claims that are cognizable in habeas corpus proceedings, and (2) Petitioner’s claims are largely unintelligible and appear to be frivolous. (Jan. 29, 21 Or., ECF No. 3.) On February 17, 2021, in light of Petitioner’s notification to the Court that he tested positive for COVID-19 on January 29, 2021, the Court sua sponte extended Petitioner’s deadline to respond to the January 29, 2021 Order until April 16, 2021. (ECF Nos. 7, 9.) On February 10, 2021, the Court received and filed Petitioner’s document…