Vatche Agopian v. Federal Express Corporation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VATCHE AGOPIAN, CV 20-5282 DSF (Ex) Plaintiff, Supplemental Order re v. Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. 93)
FEDERAL EXPRESS
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Defendant Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) filed a motion seeking attorneys’ fees and costs. Dkt. 93 (Mot.). On May 26, 2021, the Court found an award of fees was appropriate but permitted FedEx to submit a declaration attesting that records were maintained on a contemporaneous basis and Agopian to submit a declaration attesting to his financial status. Dkt. 102. Each party submitted supplemental filings. See dkts. 103 (Agopian Decl.), 104 (FedEx Suppl. Br.), 105. Agopian resubmits the same declaration he filed previously, which includes no information about his financial status. Compare Agopian Decl. with dkt. 96-1. The Court therefore will not consider Agopian’s financial status – of which it still has no knowledge – in determining an appropriate attorneys’ fees award.1
1 The Court knows that Plaintiff was fired from his position at FedEx, but it does not know whether he has obtained new employment, or whether he has…