Bridget Anne Avalos v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20215:20-cv-01163California6,387 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 BRIDGET A. A.,1 ) Case No. 5:20-cv-01163-JDE ) 12 ) Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 13 ) ORDER ) 14 v. ) ) 15 ANDREW SAUL, ) )

Commissioner of Social Security, ) 16 ) ) 17 Defendant. ) 18 19 Plaintiff Bridgett A. A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint on June 8, 2020, 20 seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of her applications for disability 21 insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). The 22 parties filed a Joint Submission (“Jt. Stip.”) regarding the issues in dispute on 23 May 18, 2021. The matter now is ready for decision. 24 25

26 1 Plaintiff's name has been partially redacted in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 27 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.