Theodore Moody v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20212:20-cv-04382California2,835 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEODORE M.,1 ) Case No. CV 20-4382-JPR 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ) AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER 13 ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) 14 of Social Security, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17

I. PROCEEDINGS

18 Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision 19 denying his application for Social Security supplemental security 20 income benefits (“SSI”). The matter is before the Court on the 21 parties’ Joint Stipulation, filed April 2, 2021, which the Court 22 has taken under submission without oral argument. For the 23 reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed. 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in line with 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 28 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 Plaintiff was born in 1972. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 3 101.) He completed some high school (AR 76, 239)2 and worked as 4 a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.