Thomas Arthur Levingston v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS L., Case No. 8:20-cv-01880-GJS
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.
17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Thomas L. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). [Dkts. 1, 4.] The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 7 and 9]. On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court reverse the final decision of the Commissioner and remand this
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A.…