Thomas Arthur Levingston v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20218:20-cv-01880California2,352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS L., Case No. 8:20-cv-01880-GJS

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Thomas L. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). [Dkts. 1, 4.] The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 7 and 9]. On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court reverse the final decision of the Commissioner and remand this

In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.