Kristin Danielle Golar v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20215:20-cv-00310California5,196 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 KRISTIN D. G., an Individual, Case No.: 5:20-00310 ADS

12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Kristin D. G.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial 20 of her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). 21 Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly assessed the 22

23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 relevant medical evidence of record and her subjective statements of record and 2 testimony regarding her symptoms and limitations. For the reasons stated below, the 3 decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.