Eric William Brown v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20215:20-cv-00703California3,234 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ERIC W. B., an Individual, Case No.: 5:20-00703 ADS

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

OF REMAND

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Eric W. B.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial 20 of his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). For 21 22

23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and 2 REMANDED. 3 II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL 4 A review of the entire record reflects certain uncontested facts relevant to this 5 appeal. Prior to filing his application for disability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.