William Barton v. William Beddick

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20212:21-cv-05125California1,176 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

18 On June 17, 2021, Petitioner William Barton constructively filed a Petition for 19 Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), which he labels “Fourth Amended Petition for 20 Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody.” Dkt. No. 1 at 1. 21 Petitioner was convicted of his underlying criminal offense in 1976. Petition 22 at 2. The instant Petition does not set forth any grounds for relief. See Petition at 5. 23 Records of the California Supreme Court indicate that Petitioner has not filed any 24 appeals or state habeas petitions with that court.1 Further, the Court notes that this is 25

26 1 The Court takes judicial notice of the records of the California Supreme Court, which are available at http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov. See Fed. R. Evid. 27 201(b)(2) (providing that a court may take judicial notice of adjudicative facts that 28 “can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot 1 the latest of multiple habeas petitions filed by Petitioner starting in 2018, all of which 2 have been dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies.2 3 On January 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Oliver held a hearing in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.