Anastacio G. Ramirez v. Scott Frauenheim
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5
6 7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 ANASTACIO G. RAMIREZ, Case No. 2:18-03628 PSG (ADS)
12 Petitioner,
13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
14 SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND DISMISSING CASE
15 Respondent.
16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent’s 18 Answer, Petitioner’s Traverse, and all related filings, along with the Report and 19 Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated May 20, 2021 20 [Dkt. No. 25], and Petitioner’s Objection to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation 21 (“Objection”) [Dkt. No. 27]. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 22 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. 23 Petitioner’s objections are overruled. In addition, in his Objection, Petitioner 24 argues that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve his claims. [Id., p. 3]. 1 || However, Petitioner fails to demonstrate the…