Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20212:21-cv-04745California444 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-4745-GW (KS) Date: July 1, 2021 Title Young Yil Jo, et al. v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al.

Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge

Gay Roberson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On June 7, 2021, Plaintiff, a California state resident proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (the “Complaint”). (Dkt. No. 1.) The Complaint is difficult to comprehend, with handwritten annotations in the margins of each page, multiple attachments, and phrases blacked out throughout the pleading. (See generally id.) As such, the complaint violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See FED. R. CIV. P. 8; United States ex rel. Cafasso v. Gen. Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1059 (9th Cir. 2011) (complaint violates Rules 8 if a defendant would have difficulty understanding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.