Dong Su v. Henry Global Consulting Group
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
10
11 DONG SU, et al., Case № 2:20-cv-02235-ODW (PLAx)
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING
13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS [20]
14 HENRY GLOBAL CONSULTING GROUP, et al., 15
16 Defendants. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On March 6, 2020, Plaintiffs1 initiated this putative class action against 20 Defendants Henry Global Consulting Group (“Global”); Goldstone Advisors, Ltd.; 21 and Henry Tongzhao USA Consulting, Inc., erroneously sued as Tongzhao USA 22 Consulting, Inc. (“Tongzhao”). (Compl., ECF No. 18.) Plaintiffs allege they hired 23 Global to act as their immigration agent, and Global failed to disclose a “finder’s fee” 24 that it earned for referring Plaintiffs to investment projects in the United States. 25 Plaintiffs assert one cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty against Defendants 26 based on their alleged failure to disclose the “finder’s fee” and for concealing the 27
28 1 The named Plaintiffs are Dong Su, Jranyi…