Jenna Noble v. Dorcy Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10
11 JENNA NOBLE, Case No. 2:19-cv-08646 ODW (JPRx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 14 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 15 DORCY, INC., a California corporation THE PLEADINGS [152] dba CONSCIOUS CO-PARENTING 16 INSTITUTE; et al.,
17
18 Defendants.
19 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff Jenna Noble moves for judgment on the pleadings as to Defendants 22 Dorcy Pruter’s and Dorcy Inc. dba Conscious Co-Parenting Institute’s (collectively, 23 “CCPI”) counterclaims for breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective 24 economic relations, and conversion. (Mot. J. on Pleadings (“Mot.”), ECF No. 152.) 25 For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Noble’s 26 Motion.1 27
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 1 …