Irma L. Anderson v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. Background
A. Factual Background This dispute relates to Plaintiff’s purchase of an allegedly defective Chrysler 300 vehicle (the “Vehicle”). See generally Complaint, Dkt. # 1-2 (“Compl.”).
On or about May 10, 2012, Plaintiff purchased the Vehicle from Defendant Cerritos Dodge, Inc. d/b/a Cerritos Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram (“Cerritos Dodge”). See id. ¶ 7. Defendant FCA manufactured and distributed the Vehicle that Plaintiff purchased. See id.
The Vehicle was covered by an express warranty. See id. ¶ 8. The warranty stated that FCA would maintain or provide compensation for the failure of the Vehicle’s performance or 1 The Court cites Plaintiff’s memorandum in support of her motion because it contains her substantive arguments. Plaintiff’s motion, itself, is Docket Entry # 18. 2 Plaintiff erroneously sued Cerritos Dodge as Cerritos Dodge Chrysler Jeep. See February 27,
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. CV 21-3125 PSG (JPRx) Date July 6, 2021 Title Irma L. Anderson v. FCA US LLC, et al. utility. See id. If a defect developed within the warranty period, FCA further assured Plaintiff that she could deliver the…