Bert Hicks v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BERT H., Case No. 2:20-cv-04922-GJS
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.
17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Bert H. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 5 and 11] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 18 (“Pl. Br.”) and Dkt. 21 (“Def. Br.”).] The matter is now ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that this matter should be affirmed.
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 28 II. ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION…