Devin McLean Wilson v. John Doe 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20218:21-cv-01008California1,906 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ) 11 DEVIN MCLEAN WILSON, ) Case No. SACV 21-1008-MWF (JEM) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 13 v. ) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH ) LEAVE TO AMEND 14 JOHN DOE 1, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 PROCEEDINGS 18 On June 7, 2021, Devin McLean Wilson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He names as Defendants John 20 Does 1 through 4, all of whom are Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputies, in their individual 21 capacities, and Scelzi Enterprises, a private company, purportedly in its official capacity. 22 For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the Complaint should be 23 dismissed with leave to amend. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS 2 Plaintiff alleges the following: 3 On December 26, 2020, an unnamed person at Scelzi Enterprises in Jurupa Valley, 4| California,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.