Robert Burchfield v. Prestige Consumer HealthCare, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20212:20-cv-10717California4,473 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 MELISSA S. WEINER (admitted pro hac vice) mweiner@pswlaw.com 2

PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP

3 800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 2150 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 4 Telephone: (612) 389-0600 5 Facsimile: (612) 389-0610

6 (Additional Counsel on Signature Page) 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ROBERT BURCHFIELD and CASE NO. 2:20-cv-10717-DSF(RAOx) 12 JEANNINE BEATY, individually and on behalf of all others Hon. Judge dale S. Fischer 13 similarly situated, 14 Hon. Mag. Judge Rozella A. Oliver Plaintiff, 15

16 v. ORDER STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

17

PRESTIGE CONSUMER

18 HEALTHCARE, INC., [DISCOVERY MATTER:

REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE

19 Defendant. JUDGE ROZELLA A. OLIVER) 20

21

22 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.