Carolyn M. Jones v. M. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20215:21-cv-00655California349 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLYN M. JONES, Case No. 5:21-cv-00655-JAK-KES

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED

v.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

M. GUTIERREZ, Warden, et al., OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the

other records on file herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the

U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 10). No objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner’s motion to supplement (Dkt. 8) is granted; (2) Petitioner’s motion for emergency hearing (Dkt. 2) is denied; (3) Grounds One, Two, Four, and Seven of the Petition (the claims 28 challenging the merits and/or timing of Respondent’s residential reentry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.