Victoria E. Banda v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20218:20-cv-01047California5,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS

17 On November 4, 2016, Plaintiff, formerly employed as a salesperson, doughnut maker, bakery clerk, cookie decorator, and dessert finisher (see AR 32-35, 201-06), filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits, alleging a disability onset date of September 9, 2016. (See AR 15, 154-60). Plaintiff’s application was denied, initially on April 10, 2017, and on reconsideration on July 25, 2017. (See AR 15, 52, 86). 24 25 On March 26, 2019, Plaintiff, represented by counsel, testified at a hearing before Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) John Kays. (See AR 31- 43, 48-49). The ALJ also heard testimony from vocational expert (“VE”) Ronald K. Hatakeyama. (See AR 43-48). On April 17, 2019, the ALJ issued a decision denying Plaintiff’s request for benefits. (See AR 15- 23). 3 Applying the five-step sequential process, the ALJ found at step one that Plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity from September 9, 2016, the alleged onset disability onset date. (AR 17). At step two, the ALJ determined that Plaintiff had the severe 8 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.