Farshad Agahi v. Ramin Khorrami

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20212:16-cv-04340California2,796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 DR. FARSHAD AGAHI, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-04340-ODW (PJWx)

1122 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

1133 v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

1144 RAMIN KHORRAMI, [52]

1155 Defendant. 1166 1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 Plaintiffs Dr. Farshad Agahi and Margaret Agahi initiated this action against 2200 Defendant Ramin Khorrami based on allegations that Khorrami physically and 2211 emotionally abused Margaret1 during their year-long affair and extorted $34,000 from 2222 her to keep the affair concealed. Before the Court is Khorrami’s Motion for Partial 2233 Judgment on the Pleadings, which is fully briefed. (See Mot. J. on Pleadings 2244 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 52; Opp’n, ECF No. 55; Reply, ECF No. 57.) For the reasons that 2255 follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Khorrami’s Motion.2 2266 2277 1 The Court respectfully refers to Plaintiffs by their first names to avoid confusion. 2288 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.