Susan Thoele v. Mainfreight Limited
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20212:21-cv-02813California309 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
July 12, 2021 Case No. 2:21-cv-02813-SVW-AGR Date
Susan Theole et al. v. Mainfreight Limited et al. Title
Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul M. Cruz N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A N/A
Proceedings: ORDER GRANTING [39] MOTION TO REMAND.
Before the Court is a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Susan Theole. Dkt. 39.
This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the instant matter. “When a claim can be supported by alternative and independent theories—one of which is a state law theory and one of which is a federal law theory—federal question jurisdiction does not attach because federal law is not a necessary element of the claim.” Rains v. Criterion Sys., Inc., 80 F.3d 339, 346 (9th Cir. 1996).
Here, Plaintiff has plead alternative theories of vicarious liability for negligence, only one of which relies on federal law. Accordingly, no federal question jurisdiction exists in this case. See id.…