511 S. Park View, Inc. v. Michael Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20212:21-cv-05251California1,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

. 511 S. Park View, Inc., CASE NUMBER: 10 2:21-cv-05251-ODW-KS Plaintiff v. 13 || Michael Ramirez et al,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.