Lloyd Carr v. James Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20212:19-cv-10248California252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LLOYD CARR, Case No. CV 19-10248-JFW (PD)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

v.

REPORT AND ADOPTING,

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

JAMES ROBERTSON, Warden, OF UNITED STATES Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision issued by the Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and the Supplemental Statement 26 of Decision and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 27 28 Further, for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.