1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LLOYD CARR, Case No. CV 19-10248-JFW (PD)

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

13 v.

REPORT AND ADOPTING,

14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

15 JAMES ROBERTSON, Warden, OF UNITED STATES 16 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

17 APPEALABILITY

18

19

20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 21 records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 22 Judge (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and the Supplemental 23 Statement of Decision issued by the Magistrate Judge. The Court has 24 engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner 25 has objected. The Court accepts the Report and the Supplemental Statement 26 of Decision and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 27 28 Further, for the reasons stated in the Amended Report and 2 || Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial 3 || showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of 4 || appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); 5 || Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2008). 6 7\ DATED: July 13, 2021 8 9 10 TEM man

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28