Warden

Jared Martin v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20212:21-cv-04285California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:21-cv-04285-MWF-MAA Date: July 15, 2021 Title: Jared Andrew Martin v. Warden

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

James Muñoz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed

On May 14, 2021, the Court received and filed Petitioner Jared Andrew Martin’s (“Petitioner”) pro se filing in which Petitioner states that he wishes to initiate a new federal case challenging his state court judgment of conviction, which recently was upheld by the California Supreme Court (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1, at 1–2.) Although Petitioner has styled this filing as a “Notice of Appeal,” he seeks to vacate a state court judgment of conviction; therefore, the Court construes this filing as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”). (See id.) The Petition alleges twenty grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) “outrageous government…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.