Jarron Edmond v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20212:20-cv-06636California4,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARRON EDMOND, an Individual, CASE NO.: CV20-06636-MCS (KSx) Hon. Mark C. Scarsi, Crtm. 7C 7th Flr. Plaintiff, Hon. Mag. Karen L. Stevenson, Crtm. 580, 5th v. Flr.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity, KURT LOCKWOOD, an ORDER RE STIPULATED individual, and DOES 1through 10, PROTECTIVE ORDER inclusive, 16 Defendants.

18 19 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary 22 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 23 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 24 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 25 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does 26 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 27 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.